Talk:Tones of Taiwanese: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Compared to Standard Chinese (Mandarin): jibsviaf) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Compared to Standard Chinese (Mandarin) == | == Compared to Standard Chinese (Mandarin) == | ||
From {{w|Standard Chinese phonology#Relationship between Middle Chinese and modern tones}}, the four main tones are 1. ym-pviaa 陰平 (55) | From {{w|Standard Chinese phonology#Relationship between Middle Chinese and modern tones}}, the four main tones are: | ||
* 1. ym-pviaa 陰平 (55) | |||
* 2. ioong-pviaa 陽平 (25) | |||
* 3. siorng 上 (21) | |||
* 4. khix 去 (52) | |||
In brackets: common realization of pitch contour. | |||
The "entering tone" (入聲, ''[[jibsviaf]]''): | |||
* does not have predictable reflexes in modern Chinese | |||
* disappeared from most Mandarin dialects | |||
Latest revision as of 11:54, 23 January 2022
Compared to Standard Chinese (Mandarin)
From Standard Chinese phonology#Relationship between Middle Chinese and modern tones, the four main tones are:
- 1. ym-pviaa 陰平 (55)
- 2. ioong-pviaa 陽平 (25)
- 3. siorng 上 (21)
- 4. khix 去 (52)
In brackets: common realization of pitch contour.
The "entering tone" (入聲, jibsviaf):
- does not have predictable reflexes in modern Chinese
- disappeared from most Mandarin dialects