Talk:Tones of Taiwanese: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Relationship between Middle Chinese and modern tones) |
(→Compared to Standard Chinese (Mandarin): jibsviaf) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Compared to Standard Chinese (Mandarin) == | == Compared to Standard Chinese (Mandarin) == | ||
From {{w|Standard Chinese phonology#Relationship between Middle Chinese and modern tones}}, the four main tones are 1. ym-pviaa 陰平 (55), 2. ioong-pviaa 陽平 (25), 3. siorng 上 (21), 4. khix 去 (52). In brackets: common realization of pitch contour. | From {{w|Standard Chinese phonology#Relationship between Middle Chinese and modern tones}}, the four main tones are 1. ym-pviaa 陰平 (55), 2. ioong-pviaa 陽平 (25), 3. siorng 上 (21), 4. khix 去 (52). In brackets: common realization of pitch contour. The "entering tone" (入聲, ''[[jibsviaf]]'') does not have predictable reflexes in modern Chinese. | ||
Revision as of 11:38, 23 January 2022
Compared to Standard Chinese (Mandarin)
From Standard Chinese phonology#Relationship between Middle Chinese and modern tones, the four main tones are 1. ym-pviaa 陰平 (55), 2. ioong-pviaa 陽平 (25), 3. siorng 上 (21), 4. khix 去 (52). In brackets: common realization of pitch contour. The "entering tone" (入聲, jibsviaf) does not have predictable reflexes in modern Chinese.